Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarita, Enock
dc.contributor.authorOule, Jared
dc.contributor.authorMungai, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorThiam, Sylla
dc.contributor.authorIlako, Festus
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T12:57:33Z
dc.date.available2021-08-24T12:57:33Z
dc.date.issued11/26/2016
dc.identifier.citationThe Pan African Medical Journal. 2016;25 (Supp 2):6.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1937-8688
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.amref.org/handle/123456789/129
dc.description© Enock Marita et al. The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) contribute to achieving development goals through advocacy, social mobilisation and provision of health services. CSO programming is a key component of Global Fund (GF) grants; however, CSOs face technical and governance capacity challenges in grant utilisation leading to missed opportunities for improving health at community level. Amref Health Africa was appointed Principal Recipient of a GF grant aimed at scaling up community case management of malaria through CSOs as sub-recipients in western Kenya. To identify potential risks and strengthen grant management, Amref Health Africa and the Ministry of Health conducted a capacity needs assessment to determine the capacity of CSOs to effectively utilise grants. Methods: 26 selected CSOs participated in this study. Document reviews and on-site assessments and observations were conducted using structured tool. The five main assessment areas were: governance and risk management; strategic and operational planning; monitoring and evaluation; programme management; and financial management. Overall performance was grouped into four categories: 3.0-2.5 (excellent), 2.0-2.4 (good), 1.5-1.9 (fair), and 1.0-1.4 (poor). Data were collected and analysed using Excel software. Results: twenty five out of 26 CSOs were legally compliant. 14(54%) CSOs were categorized as good; 7(27%) as excellent; 3(12%) as poor and 2(8%) as fair. Most CSOs had good programme management capacity but monitoring and evaluation presented the most capacity gaps. Conclusion: more than 75% of the CSOs were rated as excellent or good. A capacity building plan, programme risk management plan and oversight mechanisms were important for successful grant implementation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAfrican Medical Research Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPan African Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStrengthening health systems in communities: the experiences of AMREF Health Africa;Supp. 2: 6
dc.subjectCapacity assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRisk managementen_US
dc.subjectMalaria case managementen_US
dc.subjectCivil society organisationsen_US
dc.subjectCapacity buildingen_US
dc.subjectGovernanceen_US
dc.titleCapacity and Readiness of Civil Society Organisations to Implement Community Case Management of Malaria in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticle, Journalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • General - GEN [353]
    This is a collection of research papers from the wider Amref community

Show simple item record