Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorChase, Liana
dc.contributor.authorWagnild, Janelle
dc.contributor.authorAkhter, Nasima
dc.contributor.authorSturridge, Scarlett
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMukami, Diana
dc.contributor.authorKasim, Adetayo
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T14:51:23Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T14:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-11
dc.identifier.citationAhmed S, Chase LE, Wagnild J, Akhter N, Sturridge S, Clarke A, Chowdhary P, Mukami D, Kasim A, Hampshire K. Community health workers and health equity in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and recommendations for policy and practice. Int J Equity Health. 2022 Apr 11;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01615-y. PMID: 35410258; PMCID: PMC8996551.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.amref.ac.ke/handle/20.500.14173/981
dc.description.abstractBackground: The deployment of Community Health Workers (CHWs) is widely promoted as a strategy for reducing health inequities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Yet there is limited evidence on whether and how CHW programmes achieve this. This systematic review aimed to synthesise research findings on the following questions: (1) How effective are CHW interventions at reaching the most disadvantaged groups in LMIC contexts? and (2) What evidence exists on whether and how these programmes reduce health inequities in the populations they serve? Methods: We searched six academic databases for recent (2014-2020) studies reporting on CHW programme access, utilisation, quality, and effects on health outcomes/behaviours in relation to potential stratifiers of health opportunities and outcomes (e.g., gender, socioeconomic status, place of residence). Quantitative data were extracted, tabulated, and subjected to meta-analysis where appropriate. Qualitative findings were synthesised using thematic analysis. Results: One hundred sixty-seven studies met the search criteria, reporting on CHW interventions in 33 LMIC. Quantitative synthesis showed that CHW programmes successfully reach many (although not all) marginalized groups, but that health inequalities often persist in the populations they serve. Qualitative findings suggest that disadvantaged groups experienced barriers to taking up CHW health advice and referrals and point to a range of strategies for improving the reach and impact of CHW programmes in these groups. Ensuring fair working conditions for CHWs and expanding opportunities for advocacy were also revealed as being important for bridging health equity gaps. Conclusion: In order to optimise the equity impacts of CHW programmes, we need to move beyond seeing CHWs as a temporary sticking plaster, and instead build meaningful partnerships between CHWs, communities and policy-makers to confront and address the underlying structures of inequity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInt J Equity Healthen_US
dc.subjectCommunity health workersen_US
dc.subjectGlobal healthen_US
dc.subjectHealth equityen_US
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.titleCommunity health workers and health equity in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and recommendations for policy and practiceen_US
dc.typeArticle, Journalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record