• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   AMREF IR Home
    • Research Papers
    • Library
    • Peer-Reviewed Articles
    • View Item
    •   AMREF IR Home
    • Research Papers
    • Library
    • Peer-Reviewed Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of a rapid test against two ELISAs for a SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence survey in Kibera informal settlement, Nairobi, Kenya

    Thumbnail
    Publication Date
    2024-03-13
    Author
    Muhula, Samuel
    Type
    Article, Journal
    Item Usage Stats
    1
    views
    0
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation

    TY - BOOK AU - Y, Jane AU - Khamadi, Samoel AU - Mwangi, Joseph AU - Muhula, Samuel AU - M, Stephen AU - Kanyara, Lucy AU - Kinyua, Joyceline AU - Lagat, Nancy AU - Chege, Judy AU - Oira, Robert AU - Maiyo, Alex AU - Stewart, Roy AU - Postma, Maarten AU - Stekelenburg, Jelle AU - Hulst, Marinus AU - Osur, J. PY - 2024/03/16 SP - T1 - Evaluation of a rapid test against two ELISAs for a SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence survey in Kibera informal settlement, Nairobi, Kenya VL - DO - 10.22541/au.171062128.88515624/v1 ER -

    Abstract/Overview

    Introduction The performance of a rapid test was evaluated against two ELISAs as a potentially useful tool to determine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in low resource settings. A serosurvey was conducted in Kibera informal settlement, Nairobi, Kenya, where low numbers of COVID-19 were recorded during the pandemic. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was performed in 10 of 14 villages in Kibera informal settlement, Kenya’s largest slum community, in August 2021, before general vaccine roll-out. Participants were age one year and above with no symptoms of COVID-19. Capillary blood samples were tested using the Standard Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Combo rapid test, Platelia SARS-CoV-2 Total Ab (IgM/IgG/IgA) Assay, and Wantai Total Ab (IgM/IgG/IgA) ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 which served as the reference test. Results Samples were obtained from 438 participants; in 72 samples blood was insufficient for the Platelia ELISA. Specificity of the rapid test and Platelia ELISA were similar (>93%) but sensitivity was low (rapid test 61.3%; Platelia ELISA 83.4%). The Wantai ELISA showed greater positivity (82.6%) than the rapid test (51.8%) and Platelia ELISA (69.7%). Conclusions The Wantai ELISA showed superior performance in this serosurvey. Point-of-care tests for convenient screening for SARS-CoV-2 exposure for surveillance studies need to be developed.

    Subject/Keywords
    SARS-CoV-2, informal settlement, Nairobi, Kibera
    Permalink
    https://repository.amref.ac.ke/handle/20.500.14173/1107
    Collections
    • Peer-Reviewed Articles [49]

    Amref International University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2021 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Quick Links
    Amref International UniversityAmref Health AfricaKLISC

    Browse

    All of AMREF IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Amref International University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2021 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback